Insights · Tenders & contracts

Project changes in the contract and the tender

A construction project is a living organism: deadlines slip, additional works come in, value rises, the technical content changes. The construction contract keeps up with this through contract amendments – and the same movement has to happen on the insurance side too. This article looks at the contractual and tender dimension of amendments; the day-to-day routine of notification is covered in the companion article.

In brief:
  • Whatever is amended in the contract has to appear in the policy too – deadline, value, content.
  • Updating the certificate for the client or contracting authority can also be an obligation – as the clause requires.
  • An amendment that isn't notified comes back to bite at claim time: lapsed cover, under-insurance, a work package that falls outside the scope.
  • Good practice: contract amendment and cover update handled as a single workflow.

The three typical types of amendment

Deadline slippage: the policy's period of cover has to be extended – working on after the policy has lapsed is the most painful of self-inflicted mistakes, because it goes unnoticed. Increase in value: additional works, rising material costs – the sum insured needs to keep pace, or else under-insurance will proportion down the settlement. Change in content: a new trade, different technology, an extra location – this affects the subject matter of the cover, and can call for an endorsement (a civil engineering element appearing in a building project, for example).

The client's side: updating the certificate

If the contract's insurance clause requires cover to be maintained, an amendment automatically becomes a certification question too: cover matched to the new completion date and the new value typically has to be certified to the client. Seen from the principal's side, it's the same checking routine: signing a contract amendment means requesting an updated certificate – that's what the closing section of the checking article covers.

On tender projects

On public procurement and tender projects, amendment handling is more formalised: the contract amendment is a documented procedure, and compliance with insurance requirements can be checked for the whole contract term. The practical advice stays the same: treat the insurance update as part of the amendment package, not as an afterthought – that way the picture presented to the contracting authority stays consistent throughout. For the tender requirements, the specific documentation prevails here too.

One workflow, not two

A routine that works well is simple: whoever prepares the contract amendment has a line on their checklist – "cover updated? certificate ready?". As a broker, I can help with this: if you let me know, I request an updated cover from the insurer based on the amendment's details – the turnaround for issuing it is the insurer's call, so it's worth flagging it as early as possible. Details of the day-to-day notification routine: notifying changes; the bigger picture on timing: timing cover.

A question tailored to your own project? Book a free 20-minute project consultation →

This article is for general information only and does not constitute an offer, or insurance or legal advice. The specific covers are determined by the insurers' terms and conditions in force at any given time; the section structure and the range of extensions vary by insurer. For tender requirements, the specific tender documentation always prevails.

Related articles

Request a quote – the first step takes 20 minutes.

As an independent broker, insurers compete for you – not the other way round. I don't charge a fee for advice – the insurer pays the intermediary's remuneration; it is part of the insurance premium.

Book a slot